Do you use medical oxygen, a portable oxygen concentrator (POC), a CPAP machine, a ventilator or a respirator? Then it's time to let your voice be heard regarding the proposed rule changes in the Air Carrier Access Act.
Under the current rule, airlines can prohibit passengers from bringing aboard their own respiratory assistive devices and they can also charge for airline-supplied medical oxygen. Additionally, airlines are not required to supply in-flight medical oxygen, except on an emergency basis. As you can imagine, this can severely limit the travel options for people with respiratory disabilities.
The proposed rule could change all that.
The proposed rule is divided into two parts. One part proposes that passengers be allowed to carry their own ventilators, respirators, CPAP machines and portable oxygen concentrators abroad aircraft, provided they are first tested and approved by the airline. Devices will most likely be submitted or supplied by the manufacturer and be tested for each aircraft type; so for example, the Acme X device could be approved by Flyme Airlines for use on the Airbus A-320, but not on the Boeing 747-400. This rule would also apply to foreign airlines with direct flights to the US, providing foreign governments don't have safety regulations restricting the carriage of such devices.
The Department of Transportation (DOT) is seeking comments on whether they should limit coverage of this section to US carriers operating aircraft with over 60 seats (thereby excluding small commuter carriers). What do you think? How will that effect you?
The second part of the rule proposes that airlines be required to provide in-flight compressed oxygen to passengers upon advance request. The DOT is also considering allowing the airlines to provide portable (or full-sized) oxygen concentrators in lieu of compressed oxygen. The DOT is seeking comments from medical professionals regarding if POCs provide the same purity level and flow rate as compressed oxygen.
It should be noted that these is no provision for passengers bringing their own compressed oxygen aboard aircraft. This will still not be allowed under the proposed rule. Additionally, passengers who use compressed oxygen canisters will still have to make arrangements for in-terminal oxygen, as the rule does not require the airlines to provide that service.
The DOT is seeking public comments on whether they should require the airlines to provide this service for free, or perhaps limit or cap the amount the airlines can charge passengers for medical oxygen. The DOT notes in the proposed rule that it fully realizes the financial impact this could have on the airlines, so they will carefully evaluate this proposal before approving it. Expect the airlines to weigh in heavily on this issue, and plead financial hardship (after all several are already in bankruptcy), so it's far from a done deal.
The bottom lines is, your comments are important. The public comment period has been extended to January 30, 2006, so you have plenty of time. If this effects you, send you comments to:
Docket Clerk
Department of Transportation
400 7th Street, SW
Room PL-401
Washington DC 20590
Be sure to include the docket number (OST-2005-22298) in all or your correspondence. And if you'd like to read the proposed rule in its entirety, here's a link to it in the Federal Register:
Federal Register
Remember, this is your opportunity to have a voice in the rulemaking process. Let you voice be heard! You'll breathe a little easier for it!